HOSPITAL staff say hundreds of local jobs could be threatened by the outsourcing of secretarial work to foreign workers in India or the United States.
Fears that the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust might transfer a hefty slice of clerical and administration work overseas has raised the spectre of a second wave of NHS redundancies in Oxfordshire.
In the West Country hospital workers are threatening industrial action to stop redundancies because of the Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust's plans to send typing work abroad.
Now health staff in Oxfordshire believe that the ORH NHS Trust, faced with making savings of £33m, is considering a similar course. And the health workers union Unison this week called for a campaign to resist any outsourcing moves.
Outsourcing has become a common practice for banks and computer, electrical and telecommunications firms. Yet despite its unpopularity with consumers and patient concerns about confidentiality, it is being seen as an option for health trusts under pressure to trim their budgets.
The health workers Unison believe up to 500 health jobs at the John Radcliffe, Churchill, Radcliffe Infirmary and Horton in Banbury could be affected, with medical secretaries, personal assistants and audio typists seen as vulnerable.
In a message to its members Unison's Oxfordshire health branch warns: "Members should be in no doubt the trust is under great pressure from Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt to make large savings. The trust has already said that the admin and clerical staff budget is overspent by over a million pounds.
"The trust is right to be concerned how its staff could react. Members are already coming forward to say if outsourcing takes place they want to take action just like their counterparts at the Royal Cornwall Hospital."
Alarm bells began to ring when secretarial staff were asked to fill in questionnaires about all aspects of their work as part of an administration and clerical review. With rumours circulating that an outsourcing deal with the US-owned company Dictate IT was being lined up, Unison officials called on the trust to "come clean".
Mark Ladbrooke, Oxfordshire Unison branch chairman, said: "There is no hard information about what the trust is proposing. There are now acute concerns. Staff refuse to believe these rumours have come out of fresh air. If the Radcliffe trust attempted to go ahead with outsourcing here, there would be a serious dispute."
A letter sent to staff by the trust says no decision has been made about outsourcing. But it makes clear that no options are being ruled out.
A hospital worker, who asked not to be named, suspected the work would ultimately be subcontracted to Asia. She said serious issues about patient confidentiality would arise if letters about patient appointments and test results were being typed up thousands of miles away by private companies.
Jacquie Pearce-Gervis, chairman of ORH Patients' Forum, said: "Cuts are having to be made all over the place and the trust is looking at every possibility. But patient confidentiality must be of paramount importance. I do not think I would want all my medical typed out by someone on the other side of the world."
Philomena Tennant, the project manager of the trust's administration and clerical review, said the questionnaires were for "a trust wide review of business process".
She tells staff: "I understand that there is some anxiety that the trust has already committed to outsourcing key secretarial functions. I can assure you that no such decision has been made, although the trust is, as you would expect, considering all options for the provision of administrative support."
The ORH trust is well into the process of shedding 600 jobs across its hospitals, along with 160 beds. Trust chief executive Trevor Campbell Davis said it now looked like "no more than 60 staff" would be made redundant under the cost-cutting plan.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article