William Downing, an employment lawyer and partner with Oxford law firm Morgan Cole, examines the implications for employers from the Government’s new plans for retirement age After months of speculation, the Government has now announced a consultation exercise on phasing out the default retirement age of 65.
The proposed date is from April 6 2011, with its eventual removal from October 1 2011.
It follows on from the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations which came into force on October 1, 2006, and prohibited discrimination in employment and training on the grounds of someone’s age.
Controversial from the start, was the national default retirement age (DRA) of 65.
The introduction of the DRA was accompanied by a statutory ‘retirement procedure’ whereby an employer gives notification of an individual’s proposed retirement date within six to 12 months of that date.
An employee has the right to request working beyond retirement age and the employer has to consider that request. The DRA was the subject of immediate legal challenge by Age Concern but the previous Government, after protracted legal proceedings, was able to justify its introduction of the DRA.
Howeveer, it is all change now as our new Government is of the view that those who need or wish to work past 65, and are able to do so, should not be denied the opportunity, simply because they have reached a particular age.
There are considered to be a range of reasons for encouraging people to work beyond 65, including demographic change as people live longer.
There are financial benefits to both the individual and the wider economy, health and social benefits people gain from working, and not forgetting the removal of the costs and associated administrative burden of the statutory retirement procedure.
Under the proposals, if employers want to retain a compulsory retirement age in their organisation, they will only be able to do so if they can objectively justify it.
This is likely to be difficult to do for the vast majority of employers. The statutory retirement procedure will also be removed.
Following removal of the DRA, any dismissal of an individual will need to be conducted adopting a fair procedure and for a potentially fair reason for dismissal — namely, capability, conduct, redundancy, illegality or some other substantial reason.
It is important to note that the DRA applies to “employees” as defined by the Employment Rights Act 1996 and so, a number of groups will be unaffected by the removal of the DRA, including those professions where there is a statutory age limit, such as commercial pilots or partnerships.
The Government recognises certain cases will be caught unfairly by the phasing out and eventual removal of the DRA.
But it feels there is a need for legal certainty and a six-month period for transitional arrangements will come into force on April 6, 2011.
Employers will be unable to issue new notices of retirement using the DRA on or after April 6, 2011, and retirements that are already underway can continue through to completion if the date of retirement falls before October 1, 2011.
After that date, employers will not be able to use the DRA to compulsory retire employees and, as mentioned above, if they wish to use a retirement age, they will have to be able to demonstrate this is objectively justified.
As a result, employers are advised to: n Consider whether they still want a compulsory retirement age and if so whether they can (if at all) objectively justify it n Review all the employees who are approaching retirement age and identify if those employees can be given notice of retirement in accordance with the transitional arrangement n Look at benefits such as pension, life assurance, permanent health insurance and private medical insurance and ascertain the likely cost of continuing those benefits for employees aged 65 and over n Revisit contracts of employment and handbooks and consider what amendments will need to be made to take into account the removal of the DRA.
Contact: William Downing, Morgan Cole, 01865 262600.
Web: www.morgan-cole.com/employment
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article