I WRITE in response to Giles Sheldrick’s article (Oxford Mail, January 13), which said anti-housing campaigners wanted Oxford “not to become Swindon”.

Those opposed to the city council’s current core strategy plans have been invited to make statements to be considered at the postponed procedural hearing on February 9, the previous examination process having been suspended until legal challenges are concluded.

These statements can be viewed on the council’s website.

Wolvercote Commoners’ Committee has submitted a statement objecting to the use of safeguarded land at the proposed Northern Gateway site before other areas across the city have been fully developed.

But it is about much more than housing and not wanting to become another Swindon.

Our statement, endorsed at a public meeting at Wolvercote village hall on December 16, also refers to traffic, pollution, and infrastructure concerns currently existing in the area, and which such a development could only worsen.

We also concur with concerns previously expressed that the city council has failed to properly co-ordinate its strategy with those of adjacent districts and the county council, and question whether, having seen no evidence that local emergency service providers support a move to the site, such a move would be advantageous.

There is no sound reason why the strategy examination should be resumed until the legal process is complete and it is imperative thorough and proper consultation is part of any resumed planning process, as such consultation fell short prior to the initial hearing.

We appreciate the need for more affordable housing in the South East and in Oxford, but feel there are serious flaws in the Northern Gateway development plans that make the proposals unsustainable and unnecessary on safeguarded land.

May I suggest readers take a look at the statements submitted for the procedural hearing.

ANGELA GOFF, Chairman, Wolvercote Commoners Committee