SHAKESPEARE said: “To pee, or not to pee – that is the question?”
But at the same time he was well aware that we all have to, and that it was consequently stupid to argue thus. Hence, as he said, the argument is a “Much Ado About Nothing”.
It is clear that the council do not care about people, only money they can make. That’s why they want to take the ‘i’ out of toilet, which leaves it as ‘to let’ and makes them money.
I am disabled, and if I were shopping in Oxford and felt a sudden urge, I would have to find a toilet quickly.
If there were no public toilets, and I didn’t know where to find another, I would probably lose control (very, very much against my wishes) and have to do it on the street in front of 20-300 people.
How grossly horrid!
Perhap if the council banned its staff from using any toilet in their office buildings, they might learn something.
JOHN COLLINSON Sturt Close Charlbury
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here