Laurence Fox has lost a High Court libel battle with two people he referred to as paedophiles on social media.

Mr Fox was a familiar sight in Oxford when filming ITV’s Morse spin-off Lewis in which he starred as DS James Hathaway.

He was among the speakers to address the crowd in Oxford's Broad Street at an anti-LTN march in February 2023.

Oxford Mail: Laurence Fox and Kevin Whately film Lewis in Oxford in 2012

The actor-turned-politician was sued by former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on Twitter, now known as X, in October 2020.

READ MORE: Oxford Byron burger restaurant to be Korean BBQ joint Yori

Mr Fox called Mr Blake and the former RuPaul’s Drag Race contestant, whose real name is Colin Seymour, “paedophiles” in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury’s to mark Black History Month.

The Reclaim Party founder – who said at the time that he would boycott the supermarket – counter-sued the pair and broadcaster Nicola Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism.

In a ruling on Monday, High Court judge Mrs Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour, dismissing Mr Fox’s counter-claims.

She said: “Mr Fox’s labelling of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour as paedophiles was, on the evidence, probabilities and facts of this case, seriously harmful, defamatory and baseless.

“The law affords few defences to defamation of this sort.

“Mr Fox did not attempt to show these allegations were true, and he was not able to bring himself on the facts within the terms of any other defence recognised in law.”

Oxford Mail: Laurence Fox at the anti LTN March in Oxford in February 2023

However, Mrs Justice Collins Rice did not make a ruling on whether describing Mr Fox as “a racist” is “substantially true”, after finding the three tweets in his counter-claim were unlikely to cause serious harm to his reputation.

The judge continued: “Mr Fox’s principal project is to put his views and challenges about racism to the UK electorate in the political arena.

“That, rather than a court of law, is in any event likely to be the determinative last word in relation to his reputation on such matters, given the path down which he has set.

“His world view and his politics are not on trial in these proceedings, only the factual impact of what he said, and what was said about him, on this particular occasion.”

READ MORE: Reports that Superdry could close stores and cut jobs

Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice, Mr Fox described the ruling as a “nothing burger” and said that “here we are sat, two million bloody quid in”.

Mr Fox added he plans to appeal against the ruling to get a meaning of the word racist.

During a trial in London in November, Mr Fox was described as an alleged “intelligent racist with an agenda”.

Oxford Mail: Simon Blake (left), Nicola Thorp and Colin Seymour (right) arriving at the Royal Courts Of Justice

Lorna Skinner KC, representing Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said the trio “honestly believed, and continue honestly to believe, that Mr Fox is a racist”.

However, Patrick Green KC, representing Mr Fox, told the court that neither Mr Blake nor Mr Seymour “has suffered any actual, real-world consequences” due to the actor’s tweets.

Mr Fox told the court he was “horrified” when he saw he had been called a racist, which he later described as “a career-ending word and a reputation-destroying allegation”.

The actor said he faced a “significant decline” in the number and quality of roles he was offered after he was accused of being a racist in the social media row.