So a feasibility study is to be held into a flood defence scheme at a spot where a teenager died.
The study is being fast-tracked by the Environment Agency after 17-year-old Max Sullivan-Webb lost his life there during last week's floods.
But don't expect any immediate action to make the area safe.
The feasibility study, costing a staggering £30,000, will first have to establish whether a scheme is viable. With luck, the results may be available by September.
Then, presumably, the findings will meander their way through various committees or other talking shops.
A decision will be taken about whether the scheme is viable. The next question will be - can we find the money?
Then, finally, we might get a decision to start work.
What a rigmarole! Meanwhile, we will probably have had a dozen more floods, and more lives lost.
Feasibility studies on possible flood defences at this spot were carried out by West Oxfordshire District Council in 1995 and 2003.
Then the work was deemed to be too expensive. Can't we use those findings to save a bit of money on the current study?
Bureaucracy in this country is sometimes utterly mind-boggling.
We owe it to tragic Max to get the job done.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article