Writing for the Oxford Mail, BBOWT President, Steve Backshall says Oxfordshire's badger cull is based on bad science...
Some assume that as a wildlife filmmaker I must be a naive bunny hugger who knows nothing of farming, and would oppose any animal cull on emotional grounds.
However, I’ve lived much of my life on farmland; landscapes which even in their wildest corners need managing.
That management must be based on science though, and the badger cull is the exact opposite. I’m president of the Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust (BBOWT).
One of our counties, Oxfordshire, is affected, and we’re appalled by the Government’s abandonment of science in favour of political expediency. The randomised badger culling trial was carried out 1998-2007, cost nearly £50m and killed 11,000 badgers.
Though many deplored it, the cull was good science, and had clear results. Every wild animal studied was a repository for bovine tuberculosis. It survives in the environment and in slurry for six months. Culling badgers can lead to a reduction of new cases of bTB in cattle, but shooting badgers leads to dispersal; remaining badgers wander, leading to an increase in cases of bTB on the fringe of cull zones.
The study’s progenitor (Oxford professor Lord Krebs) stated that a cull was not viable. Instead, we needed vaccination for both cattle and badgers, and universal improvements in cattle husbandry techniques. So that’s that then.
Read more: 'Save our badgers from cruel cull' say BBOWT
Well….no. In recent months we’ve all become experts in ‘R’ numbers, vaccines and transition rates. We’ve also got used to our leaders taking this science, jotting a plan of action on the back of a sweetie wrapper, using the bits that suit them and ignoring the stuff that doesn’t.
The Krebs report was junked. Since then the Government have run scattergun ‘pilot’ culls, killing an estimated 170,000 by the end of this year; 35 per cent of Britain’s badgers. There has been no noticeable impact on bTB in cattle. With animals showing no visible signs of TB, and only 4 per cent of badgers infected, this is analogous to solving our current human crisis by wandering about the countryside taking out random people in the hope they might be carriers.
A live vaccine in cattle has been taken off the table, as it renders the produce untenable. However new developments (DIVA – a test to differentiate infected and vaccinated animals) may solve this. The badger vaccine is effective; so as pilot culls recommend trapping badgers first, why not give an injection instead of a bullet to the brain?
But these are complex, long-term plans, and the Government needs to appear decisive to powerful farming lobbies now.
Read more: Anti-hunting veggie artist takes over Blenheim Palace for rebellious art show
So culls continue. They don’t work. Some may be illegal, and they show how little value this government places in conservation and your wildlife.
We need to demand that Defra show their working, because the problem with badgers is not all black and white.
- For details of how to fight the cull, contact Oxfordshire Badger Group, oxonbadgergroup.org.uk and BBOWT at bbowt.org.uk
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article