Sir – If a child was trapped in a burning building would you immediately run in and try to save him? Or would you not act at all, for fear of being blamed if the rescue does not go to plan?
If you don’t know what you are doing, or the smoke or heat is worse than you thought, you could end up needing to be rescued yourself and may endanger the child further by wasting time and resources.
The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill, aims to encourage ‘heroism’ by removing any fear of litigation. It asks the courts to take the intentions of a hero into account, even though the law already expects the courts to do this.
So, not only does this Bill run the risk of encouraging recklessness on the part of the would-be hero, it is also unnecessary.
No one should be put off saving people through the fear of being sued. But if the Government believes that people don’t already understand their responsibilities under the law then, as the president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers told MPs recently, an education campaign is needed to help people understand what the law expects, not pointless legislation which could create greater confusion.
Richard Coleman, Withy King Solicitors, Oxford
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here