THE widower of a city GP who campaigned for the right to die has welcomed a Bill to legalise assisted dying.
Klim McPherson said Lord Falconer’s Bill – making its way through the House of Lords – was important to establish the principle of legalising assisted dying.
But the Bishop of Oxford the Rt Rev John Pritchard warned the Bill could see “vulnerable” people “manipulated”.
Mr McPherson lost his wife-of-43 years Ann – with whom he had three children – to pancreatic cancer aged 65 in May 2011.
She founded Healthcare Professionals for Assisted Dying to encourage medics to back the cause.
The Private Member’s bill, which is unlikely to win Government support, would let doctors give “competent adults” with less than six months to live a lethal dose.
Mr McPherson, 72, said: “The point is to get the principle established.
Klim McPherson
“People don’t have to live in fear of having a terrible death and they can do something about it of their own choice.”
A previous Lords bid, by Lord Joffe, was blocked in the House in 2006.
But Mr McPherson – a public health professor at the Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology – said: “That didn’t get passed because the press were totally opposed. Now they are not totally opposed.”
Dr McPherson worked in North Oxford for 35 years and said in her final days: “If I had the choice there is no question I would prefer to be dead because I feel so ill.”
Her husband said: “It was awful.
“She was so brave. She stuck with it as if it was her problem.”
Bishop John said: “Why is this Bill flawed? First because the possibility of influencing, persuading or manipulating a vulnerable or depressed person to choose death are too great.
Bishop John
“Second because the Dutch experience is that it opens the door to a seriously dangerous extension of the circumstances in which assisted dying can take place.
“Third because it fundamentally changes the doctor-patient relationship which is based on a presumption of help to live not help to die.
“Fourth because all the major medical organisations are against it.
“Fifth because investment in palliative medical care is a much better option. It all says to me: ‘Don’t go there’.”
Oxford East MP Andrew Smith welcomed the debate and said: “I really do worry about bringing about a culture where vulnerable or elderly people might feel they are a burden and under some obligation to opt for assisted dying.”
Other county MPs did not respond to a request for comment.
THE BILL
THE Bill is for “competent adults” with a “clear and settled intention” to end their life.
They must be diagnosed as terminally ill and be “reasonably expected to die within six months”.
The person would sign a declaration countersigned by two doctors and only they could take the lethal medicine.
A doctor must be satisifed they have the “capacity” to make the decision in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
It says a person who “provides any assistance in accordance with this Act shall not be guilty of an offence”.
Any declaration “with the intention of causing the death of another person” faces life imprisonment.
PM David Cameron has said he is not “convinced” by the change.
Without Government backing, MPs are unlikely to get a chance to debate it and to make it law.
- Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone's contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.
Our top stories
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel