Oxford postal workers could be heading for more strike action after pay talks with management broke down.
Staff are to be balloted for industrial action on July 10 which local leaders of the Communication Workers Union claim could result in a series of one-day stoppages starting in August.
Bosses have offered a 2.9 per cent pay rise which has been rejected by the union while plans to cut thousands of jobs in an ongoing shake-up of the service have also been vetoed.
CWU official Bob Cullen said: "We are hoping it won't come to a strike situation but we won't be dictated to.
"This is not just about wages but our right to negotiate and management are trying to get rid of the union."
Mr Cullen added the union understood the Royal Mail's need to modernise, but not at the expense of full time jobs.
He warned that it could be a situation of "postal deliveries at teatime" if management plans went ahead.
But Royal Mail spokesman Richard Hall said staff pay had risen by 22 per cent since April 2003 and that a productivity bonus would add a further one per cent onto he pay deal.
He also stressed that bosses wanted to sit down and negotiate with the CWU.
Mr Hall added: "At a time when everyone in the company needs to pull together to ensure our success in a competitive market, it is really important that we focus on the competition and not on internal issues."
A year ago, Oxford postal workers each received a £1,000 reward after national profits soared, and the service is predicted to be in the black this year to the tune of £600m when figures are announced shortly.
In 2004, a series of wildcat strikes in Oxfordshire crippled the postal service for weeks.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article