LISTEN HERE
 Jessica Goyder is the latest musician to put her singles on our site. Listen here
| THE INSIDER
 Get the lowdown inside the corridors of power in Oxfordshire here.
| SEND AN OBITUARY
Send us a tribute to someone who has passed away
| ON YER BIKE
 Get the view from the gutter with cycling group Cyclox in Oxfordshire
|
|
|
|
Dominatrix: Pervert had taste for nettles
 |
| Asron tries to flee the photographers at Oxford Crown Court |
A dominatrix has told how shamed driving instructor David Aston talked of his taste for underage girls as she whipped his private parts with stinging nettles.
Dominatrix Annie Jones, 51, said she first met Aston around 10 years ago when he employed her sexual domination services.
She said: "I could tell he was strange from the start.
"He was only about 21, but he wanted me to wrap stinging nettles around his groin and also to punch and kick him.
"He used to talk about liking very young girls, but I didn't think he was doing actually doing anything with them.
"I will tell police if I think someone is doing is something illegal.
"Now I know what he was doing, I wish I'd done more."
Mrs Jones said she last spoke to Aston around six months ago.
 |
| But appears more relaxed later |
She said: "He was going to come and see me again, but then I didn't hear from him - I thought he must have been getting his pleasures elsewhere.
"I was really shocked to hear what he had been doing with young girls, but in some ways it doesn't surprise me because he was so strange.
"He should go to jail for a long time."
11:39am Saturday 17th May 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Dave, Oxford on 12:19pm Sat 17 May 08
i love that photo, it's brilliant
i love that photo, it's brilliant
Posted by: alan page on 2:00pm Sat 17 May 08
And yet the internet is full of legal **** sites feeding incest fantasies and old men having it away with girls who look decidedly underage but aren't (files on record), school uniform fetishes etc.
On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real.
Its rather perverse and twisted.
And yet the internet is full of legal **** sites feeding incest fantasies and old men having it away with girls who look decidedly underage but aren't (files on record), school uniform fetishes etc.
On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real.
Its rather perverse and twisted.
Posted by: no name on 2:17pm Sat 17 May 08
yes people may have strange fetishes like that there are many worse one than that. he is allowed to explore what turns him on but i think the whole context with being interested in young girls is a bit over the top. girls as young as 12 are dressing themselves up trying to appeal to an older age group. people need to look at other sides as well girls will try and be slags alot of them will go out drinking and smoking and will have sex will anyone. they should be better educated and their parents should bring them up to know that selling your self like that is digusting the parents should be ashamed that their children are acting in this way.
yes people may have strange fetishes like that there are many worse one than that. he is allowed to explore what turns him on but i think the whole context with being interested in young girls is a bit over the top. girls as young as 12 are dressing themselves up trying to appeal to an older age group. people need to look at other sides as well girls will try and be slags alot of them will go out drinking and smoking and will have sex will anyone. they should be better educated and their parents should bring them up to know that selling your self like that is digusting the parents should be ashamed that their children are acting in this way.
Posted by: member of the public on 2:41pm Sat 17 May 08
this is just aload of gossip i bet its just a way for someone to make some money and to make mr aston seem nasty. why would you bring this up after the trail? reason cuz its all lies, all that info was in the papers anyway. why does people not see both sides girls are more likely to sell themselves short by lookinh like slags and sleeping with any man they meet its not lies its the truth teenagers today hve no respect for themselves. sex is drummed into their heads and press from friends make them like this.
the parents should be ashamed that their children behave in this way as they are as much to blame. they arent victims they wanted to go through with this and they must pay their concequences .
this is just aload of gossip i bet its just a way for someone to make some money and to make mr aston seem nasty. why would you bring this up after the trail? reason cuz its all lies, all that info was in the papers anyway. why does people not see both sides girls are more likely to sell themselves short by lookinh like slags and sleeping with any man they meet its not lies its the truth teenagers today hve no respect for themselves. sex is drummed into their heads and press from friends make them like this.
the parents should be ashamed that their children behave in this way as they are as much to blame. they arent victims they wanted to go through with this and they must pay their concequences .
Posted by: alan page on 2:47pm Sat 17 May 08
[quote][bold]no name[/bold] wrote:
yes people may have strange fetishes like that there are many worse one than that. he is allowed to explore what turns him on but i think the whole context with being interested in young girls is a bit over the top. girls as young as 12 are dressing themselves up trying to appeal to an older age group. people need to look at other sides as well girls will try and be slags alot of them will go out drinking and smoking and will have sex will anyone. they should be better educated and their parents should bring them up to know that selling your self like that is digusting the parents should be ashamed that their children are acting in this way.[/quote] I totally agree, but look at the kind of lifestyles celebrities are busy promoting via the media.
If kids don't have role models then they are going to imitate their direct surroundings.
But who is society throwing up? Promiscuous junkies who flaunt the law as they see fit and do nothing except get shitfaced and earn megabucks.
Is it really any wonder some kids behave like **** if that is what the adults around them are behaving like?
Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.
no name wrote:
yes people may have strange fetishes like that there are many worse one than that. he is allowed to explore what turns him on but i think the whole context with being interested in young girls is a bit over the top. girls as young as 12 are dressing themselves up trying to appeal to an older age group. people need to look at other sides as well girls will try and be slags alot of them will go out drinking and smoking and will have sex will anyone. they should be better educated and their parents should bring them up to know that selling your self like that is digusting the parents should be ashamed that their children are acting in this way.
I totally agree, but look at the kind of lifestyles celebrities are busy promoting via the media.
If kids don't have role models then they are going to imitate their direct surroundings.
But who is society throwing up? Promiscuous junkies who flaunt the law as they see fit and do nothing except get shitfaced and earn megabucks.
Is it really any wonder some kids behave like **** if that is what the adults around them are behaving like?
Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.
Posted by: anonymous, Oxford on 2:51pm Sat 17 May 08
i totallly agree that Mr Aston is a sicko and a predator, but i think it also needs to be taken in to account that these girls were, at the time willing to go through with this. as has already been ssaid there is a problem with the youth of today, whether you want to blame the parents, or press or whomever, the problems are still there. Mr aston is a prime case of someone who has been able to fulfill his sick fantasies as the youths were willing, this needs to be addressed almost as strongly as the case itself
i totallly agree that Mr Aston is a sicko and a predator, but i think it also needs to be taken in to account that these girls were, at the time willing to go through with this. as has already been ssaid there is a problem with the youth of today, whether you want to blame the parents, or press or whomever, the problems are still there. Mr aston is a prime case of someone who has been able to fulfill his sick fantasies as the youths were willing, this needs to be addressed almost as strongly as the case itself
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 3:09pm Sat 17 May 08
Justice Hall never sentences Paedophiles to a custodial.
I can only assume Justice Hall does not consider the defendant to be a Paedophile,at least not one cast from his own mould.
Justice Hall never sentences Paedophiles to a custodial.
I can only assume Justice Hall does not consider the defendant to be a Paedophile,at least not one cast from his own mould.
Posted by: Julie on 3:36pm Sat 17 May 08
Please remember it is not only the families of the victims that are suffering
Please remember it is not only the families of the victims that are suffering
Posted by: Anon, Witney on 3:52pm Sat 17 May 08
If this case teaches us anything, it's that the Internet is a very dangerous place if not used correctly and safely.
I would urge all parents of children under 16 to block these 'chat room' sites and have strict parental controls in their Internet settings so that this sort of thing will never happen again!
If this case teaches us anything, it's that the Internet is a very dangerous place if not used correctly and safely.
I would urge all parents of children under 16 to block these 'chat room' sites and have strict parental controls in their Internet settings so that this sort of thing will never happen again!
Posted by: the parent on 4:03pm Sat 17 May 08
everyone is entitled to an opinion, and i respect that, but before you judge us as parents, the fact of this are, my daughter got herself into a situation that was beyond her, you would prejudge her and be stereotypical of your opinion of all teenager girls, can you honestly say that had the girls been 16, it would have been ok for him to do this, my daughter and her friend went along with no intention of getting involved in anything her friend was doing, she was made to do this horrible act on him, before he would allow the girls to be taken home, she was not one to be given money or alcohol, she was scared and just wanted to come home..for a 30 year old man to prey on young girls as he
did, and will do again given the opportunity, is disgusting, the girls played a part in this i don't disagree, but they put there hands up to that and faced the consequences of their actions..that pervert couldn't even do that, he lied from day one about what he did, to get himself off the hook..he derserves everything coming his way.you can blame the girls, the parents, the media..whoever..but it comes back to the point, he preys on young girls, he knew they were underage and he didn't walk away, he went back for more knowing that..
everyone is entitled to an opinion, and i respect that, but before you judge us as parents, the fact of this are, my daughter got herself into a situation that was beyond her, you would prejudge her and be stereotypical of your opinion of all teenager girls, can you honestly say that had the girls been 16, it would have been ok for him to do this, my daughter and her friend went along with no intention of getting involved in anything her friend was doing, she was made to do this horrible act on him, before he would allow the girls to be taken home, she was not one to be given money or alcohol, she was scared and just wanted to come home..for a 30 year old man to prey on young girls as he
did, and will do again given the opportunity, is disgusting, the girls played a part in this i don't disagree, but they put there hands up to that and faced the consequences of their actions..that pervert couldn't even do that, he lied from day one about what he did, to get himself off the hook..he derserves everything coming his way.you can blame the girls, the parents, the media..whoever..but it comes back to the point, he preys on young girls, he knew they were underage and he didn't walk away, he went back for more knowing that..
Posted by: oxford on 4:22pm Sat 17 May 08
there is no way you can prove that he knew they were under 16 your the parent you know what age your child is but if you didnt you may not no how old they are . i believe that he wouldnt of forced them into doing anything that they did not want to do.
there where more than 1 girl with him at the time they could of easily legged it if they wanted but they chose to meet a 2nd time! this shows that they wanted to do it . i agree it was wrong but you dont know what was going through his head at the time he could of been going through a tough time and did a stupid thing that he has been paying for for the last 2 years. he has a family to support and they must be hurt too. i think he has suffered enough and that a prision sentence is unfair i hope you can see this if he was dangerous why would the police let him off why didnt they put him in prison straight away? why was he still able to teach ? he isnt dangerous people make stupid mistakes in their life and i feel that he should be given a 2nd chance threats and anger is a childish way to handle the situation it make you seem as bad as the case. but i think you should understand that your child decided to do this she had the time to say no when she was chatting to him by the net and before they met or after the first time they met. you need to seriously think about this . your child is to blame as well she isnt stupid. i think the judge should of given something to the girls as well they were drinking and smoking which is illegal. you must of known your child was doing this .
there is no way you can prove that he knew they were under 16 your the parent you know what age your child is but if you didnt you may not no how old they are . i believe that he wouldnt of forced them into doing anything that they did not want to do.
there where more than 1 girl with him at the time they could of easily legged it if they wanted but they chose to meet a 2nd time! this shows that they wanted to do it . i agree it was wrong but you dont know what was going through his head at the time he could of been going through a tough time and did a stupid thing that he has been paying for for the last 2 years. he has a family to support and they must be hurt too. i think he has suffered enough and that a prision sentence is unfair i hope you can see this if he was dangerous why would the police let him off why didnt they put him in prison straight away? why was he still able to teach ? he isnt dangerous people make stupid mistakes in their life and i feel that he should be given a 2nd chance threats and anger is a childish way to handle the situation it make you seem as bad as the case. but i think you should understand that your child decided to do this she had the time to say no when she was chatting to him by the net and before they met or after the first time they met. you need to seriously think about this . your child is to blame as well she isnt stupid. i think the judge should of given something to the girls as well they were drinking and smoking which is illegal. you must of known your child was doing this .
Posted by: DanOxford on 4:47pm Sat 17 May 08
Alan Page got worked up again:
[italic]Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.[/italic]
Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults [bold]CHOOSING[/bold] to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children.
The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it.
Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed [bold]INSTANTLY[/bold] if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care.
Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?
Alan Page got worked up again:
Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.
Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults
CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children.
The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it.
Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed
INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care.
Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?
Posted by: parent of one of the girls on 4:48pm Sat 17 May 08
i will not defend myself as a parent, i know the facts surrounding the case, and how this came about..my daughter was not an instigator in this happening,she went along once, not both times, but being loyal to her friends, as you are at that age, got mixed up in something that she didn't know was going to happen until she got there..as for legging it, where to, pray tell, he took them out of town, to a secluded area..the only thing going through his head at that time, was sexual..not his family, his children, his wife, who knew nothing of this, not his parents, his job, his friends, this was about him getting sexual gratification..he lied from the offset and tried to cover his tracks taking no responsibility, the girls admitted what they did and saw it through to the end, despite knowing they would get a hard time about it...he derserves to get punished.
i will not defend myself as a parent, i know the facts surrounding the case, and how this came about..my daughter was not an instigator in this happening,she went along once, not both times, but being loyal to her friends, as you are at that age, got mixed up in something that she didn't know was going to happen until she got there..as for legging it, where to, pray tell, he took them out of town, to a secluded area..the only thing going through his head at that time, was sexual..not his family, his children, his wife, who knew nothing of this, not his parents, his job, his friends, this was about him getting sexual gratification..he lied from the offset and tried to cover his tracks taking no responsibility, the girls admitted what they did and saw it through to the end, despite knowing they would get a hard time about it...he derserves to get punished.
Posted by: Urticaria on 4:49pm Sat 17 May 08
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
Posted by: DanOxford on 4:50pm Sat 17 May 08
And Alan- this story wasn't about drugs- FFS go to counselling with your 'druggie/ junkie' family member and work through your 'issues' so you can stop hijacking every story on here with your personal drug- related problems
And Alan- this story wasn't about drugs- FFS go to counselling with your 'druggie/ junkie' family member and work through your 'issues' so you can stop hijacking every story on here with your personal drug- related problems
Posted by: Mr Mears, Shephards Bush on 5:10pm Sat 17 May 08
I eats em.
Posted by: Naturist Justice, Phone Booth on 5:19pm Sat 17 May 08
The Punishment should fit the crime.
Justice Hall should have his private parts thrashed with Stingers by young girls.
It's the latest craze among the Country Lifers.
The Punishment should fit the crime.
Justice Hall should have his private parts thrashed with Stingers by young girls.
It's the latest craze among the Country Lifers.
Posted by: L, Oxford on 5:24pm Sat 17 May 08
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
Posted by: Major Bumsore, in the bushes on 5:31pm Sat 17 May 08
Bring back corporal punishment.. that'll sort him out
Bring back corporal punishment.. that'll sort him out
Posted by: peter, oxford on 5:39pm Sat 17 May 08
Isn't all the media interest in this just an indication of how purile and sex-obsessed society has become. Mr Aston is a victim of this just as the girls are. We will never know the girls identity so we cannot judge if he knew they were under-age. Neither do we know how old they said they were. It seems he is getting such severe treatment because of his rather bizarre tastes. Let those who have never had an unusual sexual fantasy throw the first stone. All those sun readers condemn people like mr aston, then enjoy looking at pictures of girls barely over the legal age. He was a fool to do this but doesn't deserve to go to jail for it.
Isn't all the media interest in this just an indication of how purile and sex-obsessed society has become. Mr Aston is a victim of this just as the girls are. We will never know the girls identity so we cannot judge if he knew they were under-age. Neither do we know how old they said they were. It seems he is getting such severe treatment because of his rather bizarre tastes. Let those who have never had an unusual sexual fantasy throw the first stone. All those sun readers condemn people like mr aston, then enjoy looking at pictures of girls barely over the legal age. He was a fool to do this but doesn't deserve to go to jail for it.
Posted by: Donna Anne Salad, ouch that would hurt on 5:42pm Sat 17 May 08
I heard that Mr Arson set fire to a shed recently, obviously it must have been full of nettle killer, the pervert
I heard that Mr Arson set fire to a shed recently, obviously it must have been full of nettle killer, the pervert
Posted by: B-S-M, Learner on 5:44pm Sat 17 May 08
Did he work for B-S-M Bondage and Sado Masachism !
Did he work for B-S-M Bondage and Sado Masachism !
Posted by: Mike, East Oxford on 7:05pm Sat 17 May 08
[quote][bold]Major Bumsore[/bold] wrote:
Bring back corporal punishment.. that'll sort him out[/quote] Sort him out?
He will think he has died and gone to paedo heaven!
Hopefully not a [bold]rash[/bold] decision.
Major Bumsore wrote:
Bring back corporal punishment.. that'll sort him out
Sort him out?
He will think he has died and gone to paedo heaven!
Hopefully not a
rash decision.
Posted by: fashion critic, paris catwalks on 8:21pm Sat 17 May 08
[quote][bold]L[/bold] wrote:
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless[/quote] nice socks!
L wrote:
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
nice socks!
Posted by: Ho! Ho!, Laughing my head orf! on 8:23pm Sat 17 May 08
[quote][bold]Urticaria[/bold] wrote:
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock[/quote] Cracking! Deserves a wider audience, that one.
Urticaria wrote:
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
Cracking! Deserves a wider audience, that one.
Posted by: paul, oxford on 8:25pm Sat 17 May 08
I met a girl in a nightclub once, at about one in the morning. All dressed up, full make up and very big up top. Turns out she was twelve years old. One never knows.
I met a girl in a nightclub once, at about one in the morning. All dressed up, full make up and very big up top. Turns out she was twelve years old. One never knows.
Posted by: alan page on 12:47am Sun 18 May 08
[quote][bold]DanOxford[/bold] wrote:
Alan Page got worked up again: [italic]Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.[/italic] Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults [bold]CHOOSING[/bold] to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking \'professionally posed\' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed [bold]INSTANTLY[/bold] if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn\'t live in Oxford and doesn\'t know what the f*ck he\'s on about , eh Alan?[/quote] Well Dannyboy your the one who believes that drug addicted dealers make perfect role models arent you? And that having crack and all that other crap around the place will have no impact on a child's view of the world.
So again,Dan, what social harm is created by somebody downloaded professionally posed pictures of naked children? None whatsoever. They might just as well be downloading Carravaggio paintings for all the harm it causes.
What do drug dealers and paedophiles have in common? They are both predatory scum and both have a body of pseudoscientific evidence used to claim their influence as harmless.
Both parties blame prohibition for the evils, both blame media hysteria instead of taking responsibility for their actions.
Your the one who condones drug dealing, your the one saying that police resources could be better spent elsewhere than rounding up criminals.
Even here, instead of addressing the point I made about celebrities presenting appalling role models by resembling walking Medicine cabinets you would rather take cheap shots at me than face up to the stupidity and vacuity of your position or the question of adult responsibilty to kids in general.
DanOxford wrote:
Alan Page got worked up again: Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders. Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking \'professionally posed\' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn\'t live in Oxford and doesn\'t know what the f*ck he\'s on about , eh Alan?
Well Dannyboy your the one who believes that drug addicted dealers make perfect role models arent you? And that having crack and all that other crap around the place will have no impact on a child's view of the world.
So again,Dan, what social harm is created by somebody downloaded professionally posed pictures of naked children? None whatsoever. They might just as well be downloading Carravaggio paintings for all the harm it causes.
What do drug dealers and paedophiles have in common? They are both predatory scum and both have a body of pseudoscientific evidence used to claim their influence as harmless.
Both parties blame prohibition for the evils, both blame media hysteria instead of taking responsibility for their actions.
Your the one who condones drug dealing, your the one saying that police resources could be better spent elsewhere than rounding up criminals.
Even here, instead of addressing the point I made about celebrities presenting appalling role models by resembling walking Medicine cabinets you would rather take cheap shots at me than face up to the stupidity and vacuity of your position or the question of adult responsibilty to kids in general.
Posted by: alan page on 12:54am Sun 18 May 08
[quote][bold]DanOxford[/bold] wrote:
And Alan- this story wasn't about drugs- FFS go to counselling with your 'druggie/ junkie' family member and work through your 'issues' so you can stop hijacking every story on here with your personal drug- related problems[/quote] Don't have to as he has come out of his immature druggy haze and is now back as the funny guy he used to be before he started listening to degenerate scum like you.
Maturity will reach you one day.May it give you a good kick up the arse!!
DanOxford wrote:
And Alan- this story wasn't about drugs- FFS go to counselling with your 'druggie/ junkie' family member and work through your 'issues' so you can stop hijacking every story on here with your personal drug- related problems
Don't have to as he has come out of his immature druggy haze and is now back as the funny guy he used to be before he started listening to degenerate scum like you.
Maturity will reach you one day.May it give you a good kick up the arse!!
Posted by: DanOxford on 11:23am Sun 18 May 08
[quote][bold]DanOxford[/bold] wrote:
Alan Page got worked up again: [italic]Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.[/italic] Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults [bold]CHOOSING[/bold] to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed [bold]INSTANTLY[/bold] if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?[/quote] To put the record straight:
"Well, I suppose putting her kids into care at (our) vast expense wouldn't have helped anybody and I imagine she'll be effectively finished as a drug dealer now and the 150 hours unpaid work may go some small way towards the woman making a positive contribution to the society that (presumably) has paid for her to have three children and sell her neighbours drugs."
I opposed her being seperated from her kids because it would cost me money to do so.In terms of my best interests it is better for kids to grow up being nurtered by drug dealing smackheads than placed in the care of people who may act as suitable role models whilst the mother got herself clean and found proper work to do.
It is more cost effective for children to be neglected by smackheads (sorry "recreational drug" users)than for them to have a fair and adequate upbringing.
Of course my support for drug consumption is part of the problem here. But, as Kinsey observed in regards to kiddyfiddling, this woman is one of a tiny minority of individuals who have fallen foul of drugs.
As in the Kinsey findings,for the vast majority, it is simply harmless fun.
DanOxford wrote:
Alan Page got worked up again: Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders. Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?
To put the record straight:
"Well, I suppose putting her kids into care at (our) vast expense wouldn't have helped anybody and I imagine she'll be effectively finished as a drug dealer now and the 150 hours unpaid work may go some small way towards the woman making a positive contribution to the society that (presumably) has paid for her to have three children and sell her neighbours drugs."
I opposed her being seperated from her kids because it would cost me money to do so.In terms of my best interests it is better for kids to grow up being nurtered by drug dealing smackheads than placed in the care of people who may act as suitable role models whilst the mother got herself clean and found proper work to do.
It is more cost effective for children to be neglected by smackheads (sorry "recreational drug" users)than for them to have a fair and adequate upbringing.
Of course my support for drug consumption is part of the problem here. But, as Kinsey observed in regards to kiddyfiddling, this woman is one of a tiny minority of individuals who have fallen foul of drugs.
As in the Kinsey findings,for the vast majority, it is simply harmless fun.
Posted by: oxford on 5:32pm Sun 18 May 08
i think this woman is lying how can she prove she met him?
she is only repeat what has been sed in the papers this article is aload of crap . people love to sell stories for money.
i think this woman is lying how can she prove she met him?
she is only repeat what has been sed in the papers this article is aload of crap . people love to sell stories for money.
Posted by: a former pupil of mr aston, oxford on 6:27pm Sun 18 May 08
he is a fantastic driving instructor and does not deserve to have his life ruined by silly little girls, that just want some attention, this could ruin his career or any other future careers which 4 stupid girls have caused.
he is a fantastic driving instructor and does not deserve to have his life ruined by silly little girls, that just want some attention, this could ruin his career or any other future careers which 4 stupid girls have caused.
Posted by: Osama Bin Laden, Tel Aviv on 7:28pm Sun 18 May 08
So you say the reporter has a taste for balloney?
So you say the reporter has a taste for balloney?
Posted by: lisa, oxford on 9:15pm Sun 18 May 08
Its pretty obvious its been blown out of proportion by the media because its a sex story . Why didn't the girls parents know what they were doing ?!!! I know exactly what my teenage daughter is doing. [bold]Some girls are right little tarts who know what they are doing.[/bold]
Its pretty obvious its been blown out of proportion by the media because its a sex story . Why didn't the girls parents know what they were doing ?!!! I know exactly what my teenage daughter is doing.
Some girls are right little tarts who know what they are doing. Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 10:16pm Sun 18 May 08
Should women and especially young girls be banned from whipping gentlemen about the privy parts with nettles?
Seems to me a new law could solve the problem.
I surpose the law could also ban young boys from whipping older womens paps with the same.
Should women and especially young girls be banned from whipping gentlemen about the privy parts with nettles?
Seems to me a new law could solve the problem.
I surpose the law could also ban young boys from whipping older womens paps with the same.
Posted by: One Of The Girls., Oxfordshire on 10:57pm Sun 18 May 08
well after reading the above comments i would just like to say thankyou for being so quick to judge me over this case.. yes it was wrong what happened and yes i admit that everyone has a part to play in this, but what you need to realise is that not all of us were on the chatroom me being one of them, and at that age you always tend to give in to peer pressure because if your mates were doing something then you wouldnt want to be left out. I know this will probably cause a reaction but how this story has been portrayed is exactly how it is, and to the person above for you to call me a slag when you don't even know me is just the sterotypical attitude i would expect from a 12 year old but i guess society is still shallow as what it has always been, yes you will never find out who i am but still that means you have no right to judge me, i know people are entitled to their opinions and i respect that but some of you are going a bit too far with what you are saying. I cannot change the past as much as i would want to so i hope your family NEVER has to go through what my family has for the past two years i wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy, i hope you can realise it.
well after reading the above comments i would just like to say thankyou for being so quick to judge me over this case.. yes it was wrong what happened and yes i admit that everyone has a part to play in this, but what you need to realise is that not all of us were on the chatroom me being one of them, and at that age you always tend to give in to peer pressure because if your mates were doing something then you wouldnt want to be left out. I know this will probably cause a reaction but how this story has been portrayed is exactly how it is, and to the person above for you to call me a slag when you don't even know me is just the sterotypical attitude i would expect from a 12 year old but i guess society is still shallow as what it has always been, yes you will never find out who i am but still that means you have no right to judge me, i know people are entitled to their opinions and i respect that but some of you are going a bit too far with what you are saying. I cannot change the past as much as i would want to so i hope your family NEVER has to go through what my family has for the past two years i wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy, i hope you can realise it.
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 11:32pm Sun 18 May 08
I am all for such a law,how to push it into the nations awareness presents a problem,but if parliament can foist foreign policies upon those they tax then the Stinging Nettle law should not pose a significant problem.
Maybe they could liase with BBC scriptwriters as they do now.
I am all for such a law,how to push it into the nations awareness presents a problem,but if parliament can foist foreign policies upon those they tax then the Stinging Nettle law should not pose a significant problem.
Maybe they could liase with BBC scriptwriters as they do now.
Posted by: Rachel Bennett, Wallingford on 12:48am Mon 19 May 08
[quote][bold]L[/bold] wrote:
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless[/quote] You would run like that with a bunch of nettles wrapped around your tackle!!
L wrote:
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
You would run like that with a bunch of nettles wrapped around your tackle!!
Posted by: Swampsnake, Oxford on 11:34am Mon 19 May 08
I heard he could not tell the difference between arson and incest so he set fire to his sister.
I heard he could not tell the difference between arson and incest so he set fire to his sister.
Posted by: former pupil on 7:55pm Mon 19 May 08
what they hell is arson got to do with this ppl shud have consideration for other peoples feelings and their family.
mr aston is a nice and caring man he would never do this on purpose its a mistake that he has made everyone makes mistakes but in different ways and as the girl sed they have all played a part in this so both sides are guilty but this case is out of hand especially by the press they love anything like this and blow it all out of perspective.
my feelings are with mr aston and his family.
what they hell is arson got to do with this ppl shud have consideration for other peoples feelings and their family.
mr aston is a nice and caring man he would never do this on purpose its a mistake that he has made everyone makes mistakes but in different ways and as the girl sed they have all played a part in this so both sides are guilty but this case is out of hand especially by the press they love anything like this and blow it all out of perspective.
my feelings are with mr aston and his family.
Posted by: former pupil on 9:24pm Mon 19 May 08
Mr Aston is a very kind and helpful man, he is a great driving instructor and its a great shame he has lost his job over something that silly.
The girls knew what they were getting into if not the first time but certanly the second time. If they didnt want to carry on when they first met him then why didnt they just kick and run. The young girls these days want to be all grown up but when it comes down to it they are just little girls, so watch out boys you could be the next victim.
Mr Aston is a very kind and helpful man, he is a great driving instructor and its a great shame he has lost his job over something that silly.
The girls knew what they were getting into if not the first time but certanly the second time. If they didnt want to carry on when they first met him then why didnt they just kick and run. The young girls these days want to be all grown up but when it comes down to it they are just little girls, so watch out boys you could be the next victim.
Posted by: bob, Oxford on 10:42am Tue 20 May 08
[quote][bold]alan page[/bold] wrote:
And yet the internet is full of legal **** sites feeding incest fantasies and old men having it away with girls who look decidedly underage but aren't (files on record), school uniform fetishes etc. On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real. Its rather perverse and twisted. [/quote] Evidently Mr Page has done his internet research very thoroughly indeed.
alan page wrote:
And yet the internet is full of legal **** sites feeding incest fantasies and old men having it away with girls who look decidedly underage but aren't (files on record), school uniform fetishes etc. On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real. Its rather perverse and twisted.
Evidently Mr Page has done his internet research very thoroughly indeed.
Posted by: Anon, Oxfordshire on 11:00am Tue 20 May 08
[quote]Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock[/quote]
Genius
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
Genius
Posted by: a pupil of mr aston, oxford on 12:00pm Tue 20 May 08
being a girl myself, not much older than the girls involved in this case i know just how easily girls can manipulate situations to get themselves out of trouble or to get themselves out of a situation which they have regretted doing, i have been through this myself with a friend so i know why these girls have said what they have said. but what they have done is seriously wrong, they agreed to participate and they too are too blame. they have ruined a very kind mans life, he is a very nice man and is very kind and caring.
being a girl myself, not much older than the girls involved in this case i know just how easily girls can manipulate situations to get themselves out of trouble or to get themselves out of a situation which they have regretted doing, i have been through this myself with a friend so i know why these girls have said what they have said. but what they have done is seriously wrong, they agreed to participate and they too are too blame. they have ruined a very kind mans life, he is a very nice man and is very kind and caring.
Posted by: Anony, Oxford on 2:53pm Tue 20 May 08
Anyone know what the sentance was this guy got?
Anyone know what the sentance was this guy got?
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
